An Optimization Path for "Supervisor-Counselor" Collaborative Education in Universities Empowered by Large Language Models
The deep integration of large language model (LLM) technology offers a transformative opportunity to break the long-standing zero-sum game dilemma in graduate "supervisor-counselor" collaborative education. This paper proposes a value orientation grounded in the concepts of "precision, synergy, integration, and symbiosis," and guided by the practical principles of "technological support, multi-stakeholder cooperation, resource sharing, and dynamic adjustment," to construct an optimized path system for university "supervisor-counselor" collaborative education in the context of LLMs. On this basis, it proposes reshaping a positive-sum game pattern featuring the deep integration of "academic and ideological-political education" under a fourfold guarantee of institution, platform, capability, and culture, thus providing an operable practical scheme for enhancing the management and service capacity of graduate education.
References
- Zhang, J., & Zhang, Q. J. (2021). Collaborative education of graduate supervisors and counselors—Value implications, realistic dilemmas, and path selection. Journal of Graduate Education, (1), 22–28.
- Chen, L., Wang, J. C., & Guo, Q. H. (2025). Research on the path to strengthen "supervisor-counselor" collaborative education for graduate students in the new era. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition), 41(2), 43–49.
- Kang, X. X. (2022). The dilemma and breakthrough in constructing a collaborative education mechanism between graduate supervisors and counselors. Academic Degrees and Graduate Education, (5), 62–68.
- Guo, J. X., Fu, X., Wu, Z. A., et al. (2024). Innovative research on the heart-to-heart talk work of university counselors and top-notch students in the context of artificial intelligence. Journal of Ningxia Normal University, 45(11), 12–17.
- Parker, L., Carter, C., Karakas, A., et al. (2024). Graduate instructors navigating the AI frontier: The role of ChatGPT in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100166
- Chrysafiadi, K., & Virvou, M. (2013). Student modeling approaches: A literature review for the last decade. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(11), 4715–4729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.028
- Belle, L., & Yingling, B. (2023). A preliminary study on graduate student instructors' exploration, perception, and use of ChatGPT. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.318346
- Shi, W. H. (2021). The internal logic and practical path of collaborative education between graduate supervisors and counselors. Studies in Ideological Education, (3), 130–134.
- Haken, H. (1989). Advanced synergetics (Z. A. Guo, Trans.). Science Press, pp. 23–45.
- Ren, M. (2021). A game analysis of collaborative education between supervisors and counselors in graduate education. Academic Degrees and Graduate Education, (8), 61–66.