eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Large Language Model-Driven Data Analysis Agents: A Systematic Review of Architectures and Code Generation Strategies

Yueming Lan
Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, (2026), Vol.18, No.2, pp.131-135
Published: November 3, 2026
DOI: 10.54097/9349dq61
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

Autonomous data analysis, once the domain of experienced programmers, is being reshaped by large language models (LLMs) — a shift this paper examines through a structured systematic review. Models like GPT-4, Claude, and LLaMA have reached a level of proficiency in natural language understanding and code generation that now makes it feasible to embed them inside agent-based pipelines capable of planning, executing, and interpreting analytical tasks with little human intervention. To bring conceptual order to this rapidly growing body of work, the review proposes a two-dimensional taxonomy organized around two design choices: system architecture (single-agent versus multi-agent) and code generation modality (Python-centric versus SQL-centric). Within this framework, three lines of research emerge as dominant: systems built around a single execution agent, multi-agent collaborative pipelines, and text-to-SQL generation architectures. Drawing on representative work published at leading venues between 2023 and 2025, each line is assessed with respect to planning strategies, execution feedback loops, and error-correction mechanisms. A cross-cutting analysis finds that how a system handles execution feedback — rather than whether it uses one agent or several — is the factor that most reliably separates stronger from weaker designs. The paper closes by mapping out three underexplored problems: verifying code across modalities, developing unified evaluation benchmarks, and extending multi-agent coordination into SQL-oriented settings.

Keywords: Large Language Model, Data Analysis Agent, Multi-agent System, Text-to-SQL, Code Generation, Autonomous Data Science
APA Citation: Yueming Lan (2026). Large Language Model-Driven Data Analysis Agents: A Systematic Review of Architectures and Code Generation Strategies. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 18(2), 131-135. https://doi.org/10.54097/9349dq61

References

  1. Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., et al. (2024). A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science.
  2. Li, G., Zhou, X., & Zhao, X. (2024). LLM for data management. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 17(12), 4213–4216.
  3. Sun, M., Han, R., Jiang, B., et al. (2025). A survey on LLM-based agents for statistics and data science. The American Statistician.
  4. Luo, Y., et al. (2026). Data agents: Levels, state of the art, and open problems. SIGMOD Tutorial.
  5. Hong, S., Lin, Y., Liu, B., et al. (2025). Data interpreter: An LLM agent for data science. In ACL Findings.
  6. Guo, S., Deng, C., Wen, Y., et al. (2024). DS-Agent: Automated data science by empowering LLMs with case-based reasoning. In ICML.
  7. Qiao, B., Li, L., Zhang, X., et al. (2023). TaskWeaver: A code-first agent framework. arXiv:2311.17541.
  8. Pourreza, M., & Rafiei, D. (2023). DIN-SQL: Decomposed in-context learning of text-to-SQL with self-correction. In NeurIPS.
  9. Pourreza, M., Li, H., Sun, R., et al. (2025). CHASE-SQL: Multi-path reasoning and preference optimized candidate selection in text-to-SQL. In ICLR.
  10. Hong, S., Zheng, X., Chen, J., et al. (2024). MetaGPT: Meta programming for multi-agent collaborative framework. In ICLR.
  11. Sun, M., Han, R., Jiang, B., et al. (2025). LAMBDA: A large model based data agent. Journal of the American Statistical Association.
  12. Yang, Z., Zhou, Z., Wang, S., et al. (2024). MatPlotAgent: Method and evaluation for LLM-based agentic scientific data visualization. In ACL Findings.
  13. Wang, B., Ren, C., Yang, J., et al. (2025). MAC-SQL: A multi-agent collaborative framework for text-to-SQL. In COLING.
  14. Huang, Y., Luo, J., Yu, Y., et al. (2024). DA-Code: Agent data science code generation benchmark for LLMs. In EMNLP.
  15. Li, J., Hui, B., Qu, G., et al. (2023). Can LLM already serve as a database interface? A big bench for large-scale database grounded text-to-SQLs. In NeurIPS.
  16. Gao, D., Wang, H., Li, Y., et al. (2024). Text-to-SQL empowered by large language models: A benchmark evaluation. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 17(5), 1132–1145.
  17. Hong, Z., Yuan, Z., Zhang, Q., et al. (2025). Next-generation database interfaces: A survey of LLM-based text-to-SQL. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
  18. Jiang, J., Xie, H., Shen, S., et al. (2025). SiriusBI: A comprehensive LLM-powered solution for data analytics in business intelligence. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 18(12), 4860–4873.
  19. Li, P., He, Y., Yashar, D., et al. (2024). Table-GPT: Table fine-tuned GPT for diverse table tasks. Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data, 2(3), 176.
  20. Grosnit, A., Maraval, A., et al. (2024). Large language models orchestrating structured reasoning achieve Kaggle grandmaster level. arXiv:2411.03562.
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants