eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Conceptual Metaphors in Official Documents of International Organizations

Guo Zhen
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, (2025), Vol.5, No.9, pp.177-194
Published: September 18, 2025
DOI: 10.54691/v7mxkm64
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is the most important agenda of the United Nations. However, previous research on UN documents from the perspective of conceptual metaphors is still limited. This study identifies and analyzes conceptual metaphors in the Agenda, and employs qualitative and quantitative approaches to construct a CMA framework. The study finds that: First, conceptual metaphors are abundant in the documents, with a total of 5905 occurrences. Second, the text delineates 17 conceptual metaphors: orientational metaphor, target metaphor, biological metaphor, team metaphor, architectural metaphor, journey metaphor, war metaphor, stage metaphor, identity metaphor, moral metaphor, dialogue metaphor, factory metaphor, body metaphor, game metaphor, color metaphor, nature metaphor, and burden metaphor. Third, the CMA recursive model of context analysis can critically analyze the above 17 metaphor types with effect.

Keywords: Conceptual metaphor, critical metaphor analysis, the United Nations documents.
APA Citation: Guo Zhen (2025). Conceptual Metaphors in Official Documents of International Organizations. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(9), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.54691/v7mxkm64

References

  1. United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda For Sustainable Development[R]. New York: United Nations,2015.
  2. WU Jianguo, GONG Chun, SONG Yue. A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Political Discourse: Taking Trump's Speeches as Examples[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages (Journal of Shanghai International Studies University), 2020, 43(03): 80-88.
  3. ARISTOTLE. Rhetoric and Poetics[M].New York: The Modern Library,1954.
  4. BLACK M. Models and Metaphors[M].New York: Cornell University Press,1962.
  5. LAKOFF G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by[M].Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
  6. FAUCONNIER G. Mental Spaces[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1985.
  7. LI Guonan. Figures of Speech and Vocabulary [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2001.
  8. ZHANG Hui, GAI Feihong. Conceptual Metaphors in Chinese and American News Discourses from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics[J]. Modern Foreign Languages, 2022, 45(05): 621-633.
  9. CHARTERIS-BLACK J. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004
  10. CHARTERIS-BLACK, J. Analyzing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor[M]. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2014.
  11. JI Yuhua, CHEN Yan. A New Method of Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Metaphor Analysis[J]. Journal of Xiamen University (Arts and Social Sciences Edition), 2007(06): 42-48.
  12. WU Jianguo, LI Diqiao. Critical Metaphor Analysis: Frontiers and Prospects[J]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 2023(04): 87-97, 149.
  13. United Nations. Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators[R]. New York: United Nations,2015.
  14. United Nations. Long-term future trends and scenarios: impacts on the realization of the Sustainable Development Goals[R]. New York: United Nations,2015.
  15. United Nations. New governance insights to advance the Sustainable Development Goals and eradicate poverty[R]. New York: United Nations,2015.
  16. United Nations. Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals: towards a rescue plan for people and planet[R]. New York: United Nations,2015.
  17. United Nations. Summary by the President of the Economic and Social Council of the high-level political forum on sustainable development convened under the auspices of the Council at its 2023 session[R]. New York: United Nations,2015.
  18. United Nations. Work on the review of progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals[R]. New York: United Nations,2015.
  19. STEEN G J. Researching And Applying Metaphor[J]. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2010.
  20. HU Chunyu, XU Yuting. A Study of Plant Metaphors Based on a Chinese-English Economic Media Corpus[J]. Foreign Language Teaching, 2019, 40(06): 44-49.
  21. JIN Juan. Cultural Commonalities of Biological Metaphors in Chinese and English Economic Discourses[J]. Journal of Mudanjiang College of Education, 2015(06): 25, 83.
  22. DUNMIRE P. Projecting the Future Through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine[M].Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company,2011.
  23. FAIRCLOUGH N. Analysing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research[M].London: Routledge, 2003
  24. CAP P. Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern U.S. War Rhetoric[M].New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Press,2008.
  25. SHENG Dandan. Journey Metaphors in Chinese-English Conference Interpreting: A Corpus-Based Study[J]. Shanghai Journal of Translators, 2021(01): 65-70.
  26. SONG Suhong, Chen Yanming. Media Representation of “Nationalization of Disease Control”: A Textual Analysis of War Metaphors in Epidemic Reports[J]. Contemporary Communications, 2022(02): 35-39, 61.
  27. ZHANG Lin. Conceptual Mapping in Cognition and Communication: Taking “War” Metaphors in Epidemic Reports as Examples[J]. Masterpieces Review, 2020(20): 54-56.
  28. CRAMWINCKEL F M, DE CREMER D, & VAN DIJKE M. Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! The effects of touching dirty objects on rewarding unethical subordinates as a function of a leader’s self-interest[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013,115, 93-100.
  29. DONG Gefei, WANG Qianqian. A Study on Metaphor Patterns in American Educational Discourses Based on Wmatrix: Taking the Educational Speeches of Bush and Obama as Examples[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science Edition), 2019, 21(01): 96-103.
  30. GOETHE J W. Theory of Colours[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press,1970.
  31. Yao Yuan. The “Architectural Metaphor” in the Principles of Historical Materialist Jurisprudence[J]. Law and Social Development, 2020, 26(06): 199-221.
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants