eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Enhancing Teachers’ Instructional Skills in Higher Vocational Education through Mind Mapping

Na Zhuo
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, (2026), Vol.6, No.1, pp.1-9
Published: January 20, 2026
DOI: 10.54691/p62t4z03
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

Amid global educational reform, higher vocational education demands teachers demonstrate integrated skills combining subject knowledge, pedagogy, and technology. However, many vocational teachers struggle with organizing complex content and systematic reflection, while traditional training often lacks practical tools for integrated competence. Mind mapping, a visual cognitive tool, shows considerable potential in supporting instructional design, classroom teaching, and reflective practice. Grounded in mind mapping theory and the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, this study adopts a reform-oriented qualitative approach based on literature analysis and reflective examination. The findings indicate that mind mapping supports teachers in clarifying instructional logic, strengthening pedagogical coherence, deepening reflective awareness, and improving the integration of technology, pedagogy, and content. These results provide theoretical support and practical implications for instructional reform and teacher professional development in higher vocational education.

Keywords: Mind Mapping; Higher Vocational Education; Teachers’ Instructional Skills; Educational Reform; TPACK.
APA Citation: Na Zhuo (2026). Enhancing Teachers’ Instructional Skills in Higher Vocational Education through Mind Mapping. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.54691/p62t4z03

References

  1. Buzan, T. (2018). Mind Map Mastery. London: Watkins.
  2. Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2010). The Mind Map Book. London: BBC Active.
  3. Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S., Yin, H. B., Chen, M., & Zhou, W. (2019). Validating and modelling TPACK framework among Asian preservice teachers. Computers & Education, 135, 1–13.
  4. Davies, M. (2019). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 78(2), 213–229.
  5. Farrell, T. S. C. (2019). Reflective practice in ESL teacher development. New York: Routledge.
  6. Keles, Ö. (2020). The effects of mind mapping on students’ learning outcomes. Educational Research Review, 29, 100308.
  7. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
  8. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
  9. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants