eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Practice and Exploration of Postgraduate Education Reform in Civil Engineering

Da Wang, Zhifeng Wang, Hongxi Qin, Yuanyuan Li, Yi Hu, Fan Liu
International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, (2025), Vol.8, No.5, pp.32-36
Published: April 16, 2025
DOI: 10.6918/IJOSSER.202505_8(5).0005
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

This study examines the transformative strategies for postgraduate education in civil engineering to address evolving industry demands in the context of technological advancements. By analyzing systemic challenges in traditional pedagogical frameworks and proposing an innovative "Four-Dimensional Drive, Five-Chain Integration" model, the research highlights actionable pathways for enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration, digital integration, and industry alignment. Empirical evidence from institutional reforms demonstrates significant improvements in talent quality, technological innovation, and educational ecosystem sustainability.

Keywords: Postgraduate education reform in civil engineering; Four-dimensional drive and five-chain integration; Industry-academia collaboration; Digital-intelligent empowerment; Interdisciplinary engineering education.
APA Citation: Da Wang, Zhifeng Wang, Hongxi Qin, Yuanyuan Li, Yi Hu, Fan Liu (2025). Practice and Exploration of Postgraduate Education Reform in Civil Engineering. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 8(5), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202505_8(5).0005

References

  1. World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. Geneva.
  2. National Academy of Engineering. (2021). Engineering Education for the 21st Century. National Academies Press.
  3. Smith, J., et al. (2022). "Industry-Academia Collaboration in Engineering Education." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 148(3), 04022012.
  4. OECD. (2019). Innovation Strategy for Education Systems. OECD Publishing.
  5. Borrego, M., et al. (2020). "Interdisciplinary Engineering Education." IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(2), 134–141.
  6. McKinsey & Company. (2023). Digital Transformation in Construction. Technical Report.
  7. Zhou, Y., et al. (2023). "Geopolymer Innovations in Infrastructure." Cement and Concrete Research, 172, 107235.
  8. Li, X., & Wang, H. (2024). "AI Applications in Structural Engineering." Automation in Construction, 158, 105203.
  9. UNIDO. (2023). Sustainable Materials for Global Infrastructure. United Nations.
  10. ISO. (2022). ISO 19650-1:2022: Organization and Digitization of Information. International Standards Organization.
  11. Ministry of Education. (2023). Guidelines for Engineering Education Reform. Beijing.
  12. Sacks, R., et al. (2018). "BIM in Education." Advanced Engineering Informatics, 37, 13–24.
  13. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. Jossey-Bass.
  14. Crawley, E. F., et al. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Springer.
  15. National Research Council. (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. National Academies Press.
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants