eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

The Reconstruction of Educators’ Roles in Moral Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Pei Zhang
International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, (2026), Vol.9, No.3, pp.130-135
Published: March 16, 2026
DOI: 10.6918/IJOSSER.202603_9(3).0015
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

There is an essential distinction between moral education and general knowledge education. The core of moral education is to address value propositions and cultivate sound moral personality, rather than the mere transmission of ethical knowledge. Mainstream global moral education practice has long been trapped in the inherent dilemma of intellectualization alienation and the disjunction between cognition and practice. The popularization of artificial intelligence (AI) has not only brought a more fundamental and subversive challenge to the traditional educator-centered authoritative paradigm of moral education, giving rise to unprecedented moral education risks, but also clearly delineated the irreplaceable value of educators through its insurmountable inherent boundaries in the transformation from cognition to practice, emotional connection, and value guidance. AI provides a historic opportunity for moral education reform: it frees up educators’ core energy, compels the transformation of their roles, and drives moral education to return to its essential nature of nurturing people.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Moral Education, Educator Roles
APA Citation: Pei Zhang (2026). The Reconstruction of Educators’ Roles in Moral Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 9(3), 130-135. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202603_9(3).0015

References

  1. Glanzer P L, Ream T C. Addressing the Moral Quandary of Contemporary Universities: Rejecting a less than Human Moral Education [J]. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 2008,
  2. Roll I, Wylie R. Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education [J]. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2016, 26(2):582-599.
  3. Andreas Matthias. The Responsibility Gap: Ascribing Responsibility for the Actions of Learning Automata [J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2004(03).
  4. Mark Coeckelbergh. Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relation Justification of Explainability [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2020, 26(04).
  5. Patrick Chisan Hew. Artificial moral agents are infeasible with foreseeable technologies [J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2014, 16(03).
  6. Francisco Lara, Jan Deckers. Artificial Intelligence as a Socratic Assistant for Moral Enhancement [J]. Neuroethics, 2020, 13(03).
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants