Technology-Enhanced Simulation and 3D-Enabled Learning in Orthopaedic Postgraduate Education: Challenges and Practical Priorities

Duan Wang; Shuoyuan Li; Xiangtian Deng

doi:10.6918/IJOSSER.202608_9(8).0017

Technology-Enhanced Simulation and 3D-Enabled Learning in Orthopaedic Postgraduate Education: Challenges and Practical Priorities

Duan Wang, Shuoyuan Li, Xiangtian Deng

International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, (2026), Vol.9, No.8, pp.164-169

Published: August 12, 2026

DOI: 10.6918/IJOSSER.202608_9(8).0017

PDF: Download Full Text PDF

Abstract

Orthopaedic simulation is often discussed as a choice between a screen, a printed model and a virtual-reality system. That choice comes later. A teaching session first needs a clinical task, such as selecting cup landmarks, explaining an acetabular reduction sequence or keeping a drill within a safe corridor. This perspective examines recent work on virtual simulation and three-dimensional (3D) models in postgraduate orthopaedics. The evidence is encouraging for selected procedural and anatomical outcomes, but it is heterogeneous and gives limited guidance on transfer to patient care. We use the case as the unit of curriculum design. The learner interprets the images, commits to a plan, rehearses the relevant step and then accounts for errors. A subsequent case should alter something clinically important rather than repeat the same geometry. Kern's curriculum framework, deliberate practice, debriefing, validity arguments and entrustment provide reference points for planning and assessment. The practical conclusion is modest: use the least complex medium that exposes the decision or action requiring practice, and do not treat a simulator score as clinical competence.

Keywords: Orthopaedic postgraduate education; Technology-enhanced simulation; 3D-enabled learning; Competency-based education; Surgical training.

APA Citation: Duan Wang, Shuoyuan Li, Xiangtian Deng (2026). Technology-Enhanced Simulation and 3D-Enabled Learning in Orthopaedic Postgraduate Education: Challenges and Practical Priorities. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 9(8), 164-169. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202608_9(8).0017

References

Mitchell, A. A., & Ivimey-Cook, E. R. (2023). Technology-enhanced simulation for healthcare professionals: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 10, 1149048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1149048.
Seil, R., Hoeltgen, C., Thomazeau, H., Anetzberger, H., & Becker, R. (2022). Surgical simulation training should become a mandatory part of orthopaedic education. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 9(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00455-1
Clarke, E. (2021). Virtual reality simulation-the future of orthopaedic training? A systematic review and narrative analysis. Advances in Simulation, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-020-00153-x
Berthold, D. P., Muench, L. N., Rupp, M. C., et al. (2022). Head-mounted display virtual reality is effective in orthopaedic training: a systematic review. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 4(5), e1843–e1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.05.009
Mao, R. Q., Lan, L., Kay, J., et al. (2021). Immersive virtual reality for surgical training: a systematic review. Journal of Surgical Research, 268, 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.045
Salazar, D., Thompson, M., Rosen, A., & Zuniga, J. (2022). Using 3D printing to improve student education of complex anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Science Educator, 32(5), 1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01595-w
Brumpt, E., Bertin, E., Tatu, L., & Louvrier, A. (2023). 3D printing as a pedagogical tool for teaching normal human anatomy: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 783. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04744-w
Goyal, S., Chua, C. X. K., Chen, Y. S., Murphy, D., & O'Neill, G. K. (2022). Utility of 3D printed models as adjunct in acetabular fracture teaching for orthopaedic trainees. BMC Medical Education, 22, 595. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03621-2
Wang, H., Yang, T., Hua, W., Zhang, W., & Lu, L. (2025). Integrated 3D printing and case-based learning in orthopedic residency education for geriatric hip fracture management. Frontiers in Surgery, 12, 1659207. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1659207
Singh, M. K., Gullett, H. L., & Thomas, P. A. (2021). Using Kern's 6-step approach to integrate health systems science curricula into medical education. Academic Medicine, 96(9), 1282–1290. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004141
Ng, C., Primiani, N., & Orchanian-Cheff, A. (2021). Rapid cycle deliberate practice in healthcare simulation: a scoping review. Medical Science Educator, 31(6), 2105–2120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01446-0
Duff, J. P., Morse, K. J., Seelandt, J., et al. (2024). Debriefing methods for simulation in healthcare: a systematic review. Simulation in Healthcare, 19(1S), S112–S121. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000765
Lee, G. B., & Chiu, A. M. (2022). Assessment and feedback methods in competency-based medical education. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 128(3), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2021.12.010
Carrillo-Avalos, B. A., Leenen, I., Trejo-Mejía, J. A., & Sanchez-Mendiola, M. (2025). Bridging validity frameworks in assessment: beyond traditional approaches in health professions education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 37(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2023.2293871
Brasel, K. J., Lindeman, B., Jones, A., et al. (2023). Implementation of entrustable professional activities in general surgery: results of a national pilot study. Annals of Surgery, 278(4), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005991.