eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Trust as a Mediating Factor in Enhancing Investors' Intention to Use Robo-Advising

Yingting Fu
Journal of Innovation and Development, (2026), Vol.17, No.2, pp.100-107
Published: October 27, 2026
DOI: 10.54097/wba0r244
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has developed rapidly in recent years. Beyond its specialized domains, it has also been applied to an increasing range of other fields. Prior research suggests that traditional financial decisions are typically reached through investors' own judgment, and that such judgment is readily subject to interference from human factors and other considerations, which compromises the accuracy of the resulting decisions. In response, many developers have introduced AI into the financial industry and integrated it with investment services, giving rise to a novel form of advisory known as robo-advising, or intelligent investment advisory. Robo-advising not only breaks with the conventional human-based advisory model through AI technologies, but also helps investors make more effective decisions, thereby reducing potential losses. Existing studies have proposed that the perceived usefulness of robo-advisory technology affects users' attitude and usage intention, and that information transparency likewise affects users' attitude and usage intention, with attitude positively related to usage intention. However, relatively few studies have examined trust as a mediating mechanism through which these factors shape investors' intention to use robo-advisory. Accordingly, this study employs correlation analysis, regression analysis, and structural equation modeling to analyze the data collected from a questionnaire survey and to test the proposed hypotheses. The findings indicate that the perceived usefulness and information transparency of robo-advising are capable of establishing investor trust, and that such trust can alter investors' attitude toward robo-advising, thereby enhancing their usage intention. In addition, this study aims to offer more effective recommendations for robo-advisory technology and to support the continued development of robo-advisory investment services.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Robo-advising, Perceived usefulness, Information transparency, Intention to use.
APA Citation: Yingting Fu (2026). Trust as a Mediating Factor in Enhancing Investors' Intention to Use Robo-Advising. Journal of Innovation and Development, 17(2), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.54097/wba0r244

References

  1. Oguntibeju, O. O. (2024). Mitigating artificial intelligence bias in financial systems: A comparative analysis of debiasing techniques. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 17(12), 165–178.
  2. Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in FinTech: Understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1411–1430. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-08-2018-0368
  3. Arsenault, P.-D., Wang, S., & Patenaude, J.-M. (2025). A survey of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in financial time series forecasting. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(10), Article 265, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3729531
  4. Anuar, A. A., Sulaiman, A. A. B., & Mohamad, M. T. B. (2025). Comparative analysis of AI-driven versus human-managed equity funds across market trends. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00540-8
  5. Arora, S., Rajesh, A., Misra, R., & Singh, G. (2025). Bridging technology and trust: The role of AI-driven robo-advisors in middle-class financial management. Management Decision.
  6. Hong, X., Pan, L., Gong, Y., & Chen, Q. (2023). Robo-advisors and investment intention: A perspective of value-based adoption. Information & Management, 60(6), 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103832
  7. Li, S., Younas, M. W., Maqsood, U. S., & Zahid, R. M. A. (2025). Tech for stronger financial market performance: The impact of AI on stock price crash risk in emerging market. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 20(10), 4005–4030.
  8. Hasan, Z., Vaz, D., Athota, V. S., Désiré, S. S. M., & Pereira, V. (2023). Can artificial intelligence (AI) manage behavioural biases among financial planners? Journal of Global Information Management, 31(2), 1–18.
  9. Singh, S., & Kumar, A. (2025). Investing in the future: An integrated model for analysing user attitudes towards robo-advisory services with AI integration. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of Management, 22(1), 158–175.
  10. Isaia, E., & Oggero, N. (2022). The potential use of robo-advisors among the young generation: Evidence from Italy. Finance Research Letters, 48, 103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103046
  11. Yeh, H.-C., Yu, M.-C., Liu, C.-H., & Huang, C.-I. (2023). Robo-advisor based on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(4), 962–979. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-07-2021-0493
  12. Silber, D., Hoffmann, A., & Belli, A. (2025). Embracing AI advisors for making (complex) financial decisions: An experimental investigation of the role of a maximizing decision-making style. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 43(6), 1325–1346. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-09-2024-0487
  13. Yi, T. Z., Rom, N. A. M., Hassan, N. M., Samsurijan, M. S., & Ebekozien, A. (2023). The adoption of robo-advisory among millennials in the 21st century: Trust, usability and knowledge perception. Sustainability, 15(7), 6016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076016
  14. Zhang, S. (2024). Consumer attitudes towards AI-based financial advice: Insights for decision support systems (DSS) and technology integration. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security, 14(4), 1–20.
  15. Maier, T., Menold, J., & McComb, C. (2022). The relationship between performance and trust in AI in e-finance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 891529. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.891529
  16. Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., Wasson, B., Tømte, C., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Coelho, R., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2025). What explains teachers’ trust in AI in education across six countries? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(3), 1288–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00476-9
  17. Afroogh, S., Akbari, A., Malone, E., Kargar, M., & Alambeigi, H. (2024). Trust in AI: Progress, challenges, and future directions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1568. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04044-8
  18. Ni, Y. (2024). The impact of explainable AI on customer trust and satisfaction in banking. Journal of Information, Technology and Policy, 2(1), 13–18.
  19. Irimia-Diéguez, A., Velicia-Martín, F., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2023). Predicting fintech innovation adoption: The mediator role of social norms and attitudes. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00447-6
  20. Kim, S.-W., & Lee, Y. (2024). Investigation into the influence of socio-cultural factors on attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 9907–9935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-02612-3
  21. Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925
  22. Ghorbanzadeh, D., & Rahehagh, A. (2021). Emotional brand attachment and brand love: The emotional bridges in the process of transition from satisfaction to loyalty. Rajagiri Management Journal, 15(1), 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-04-2020-0018
  23. Zhu, H., Vigren, O., & Söderberg, I.-L. (2024). Implementing artificial intelligence empowered financial advisory services: A literature review and critical research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114494
  24. Selvamani, V. L., Azam, M. S., Shalini, R., & Lakshmi, J. (2026). Investigating Gen Z’s equity investment intentions through a novel integrated psychological framework: An empirical validation. Acta Psychologica, 264, 106402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106402
  25. Xie, C., & Yang, X. (2024). Expanding the middle-income group through education: Preliminary evidence from China. ECNU Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241265371
  26. Markus, A., Carolus, A., & Wienrich, C. (2025). Objective measurement of AI literacy: Development and validation of the AI competency objective scale (AICOS). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100485
  27. Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
  28. Shrestha, N. (2020). Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-8-2-1
  29. Ozili, P. K. (2023). The acceptable R-square in empirical modelling for social science research. In C. Saliya (Ed.), Social research methodology and publishing results: A guide to non-native English speakers (pp. 134–143). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6859-3.ch009
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants