eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Study on Macroeconomic Risk Exposure under the Background of Green and Low-carbon Transition

Yao Zheng
Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research, (2026), Vol.8, No.2, pp.36-45
Published: February 28, 2026
DOI: 10.54691/th8ap237
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

Promoting green and low-carbon transformation of economy and society is an important means for countries in the world to actively respond to global climate change.However, due to different national conditions, economic stages and economic structures of countries, the risks they face in the process of promoting green and low-carbon transformation are different. In this regard, this study takes China's provinces as the research objects, and studies the green and low-carbon transformation risks of each province according to the degree of provincial dependence on sunset industries in terms of foreign exchange earnings, fiscal taxes and employment wages. The results show that the mining and supply of fossil energy and the processing of non-ferrous metals are important sources of carbon emissions. In this regard, this paper puts forward some suggestions from the aspects of precise control of transformation risks, prevention of risks to achieve safe carbon reduction, and the main issues of "efficiency and fairness".

Keywords: Green and Low-carbon Transformation; Exposure to Risk; Input-output Model.
APA Citation: Yao Zheng (2026). Study on Macroeconomic Risk Exposure under the Background of Green and Low-carbon Transition. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research, 8(2), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.54691/th8ap237

References

  1. Battiston S, Mandel A, Monasterolo I, et al. A climate stress-test of the financial system[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(4): 283-288.
  2. Semieniuk G, Campiglio E, Mercure J F, et al. Low‐carbon transition risks for finance[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2021, 12(1): e678.
  3. Savona M, Ciarli T. Structural changes and sustainability. A selected review of the empirical evidence[J]. Ecological economics, 2019, 159: 244-260.
  4. Mealy P, Teytelboym A. Economic complexity and the green economy[J]. Research Policy, 2022, 51(8): 103948.
  5. Chen Z, Marin G, Popp D, et al. Green stimulus in a post-pandemic recovery: the role of skills for a resilient recovery[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2020, 76(4): 901-911.
  6. Consoli D, Marin G, Marzucchi A, et al. Do green jobs differ from non-green jobs in terms of skills and human capital?[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(5): 1046-1060.
  7. McGlade C, Ekins P. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 C[J]. Nature, 2015, 517(7533): 187-190.
  8. Zheng H, Bai Y, Wei W, et al. Chinese provincial multi-regional input-output database for 2012, 2015, and 2017[J]. Scientific data, 2021, 8(1): 244.
  9. Shan Y, Huang Q, Guan D, et al. China CO2 emission accounts 2016–2017[J]. Scientific data, 2020, 7(1): 54.
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants