eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

The Same Change, Opposite Feelings

Tiantian Zhang
Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research, (2026), Vol.8, No.8, pp.140-144
Published: July 21, 2026
DOI: 10.54691/q3rcf228
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

Gender ideological clash is not inevitable, but it is occurring because the same social change is experienced as different psychological threats by men and women. Politics for many young women is emerging as a language of safety, autonomy and incomplete equality for their bodies. The same changes for many young men can manifest as no longer feeling recognized, unstable status and financial insecurity. This is not to say that women's fears and men’s grievances are morally on a par. It’s a psychological reason: ideology can arise out of what people emotionally mean by the term “social change.” Equality that is enjoyed by one group and not yet by the other feels like protection to the first group and less security to the latter, and leads not only to disagreement. It is a conflict over what reality feels like. Education, age, and media exposure are important, but they cannot fully account for why the same event may be interpreted as liberation by one group and humiliation by another. A psychological explanation must address what is threatened, protected or confirmed in the sense of self of individuals in regard to the social change.

Keywords: Gender ideological gap, political polarization, social media, status anxiety, gender politics.
APA Citation: Tiantian Zhang (2026). The Same Change, Opposite Feelings. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research, 8(8), 140-144. https://doi.org/10.54691/q3rcf228

References

  1. Nennstiel, R., & Hudde, A. (2025). Is there a growing gender divide among young adults in regard to ideological left–right self-placement? Evidence from 32 European countries. European Sociological Review, 41(6), 862–883. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaf021
  2. Saad, L. (2024, February 7). U.S. women have become more liberal; men mostly stable. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/609914/women-become-liberal-men-mostly-stable.aspx
  3. Saad, L., Jones, S. E., & Fioroni, S. (2024, September 12). Exploring young women’s leftward expansion. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/649826/exploring-young-women-leftward-expansion.aspx
  4. World Health Organization. (2024, March 25). Violence against women. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
  5. Pain, R. H. (1997). Social geographies of women’s fear of crime. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1997.00231.x
  6. Enock, F. E., Stevens, F., Bright, J., Cross, M., Johansson, P., Wajcman, J., & Margetts, H. Z. (2024). Understanding gender differences in experiences and concerns surrounding online harms: A short report on a nationally representative survey of UK adults. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.00463
  7. Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
  8. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
  9. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
  10. Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826
  11. Lee, S. C. (2025). Anti-gender politics, economic insecurity, and right-wing populism: The rise of modern sexism among young men in South Korea. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 32(3), 584–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxae016
  12. Jung, H. W. (2023). A new variation of modern prejudice: Young Korean men’s anti-feminism and male-victim ideology. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1230577. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1230577
  13. Jenkins, M. D., & Kim, H. J. (2024). The role of misogyny in the 2022 Korean presidential election: Understanding the backlash against feminism in industrialized democracies. Journal of East Asian Studies, 24, 169–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2024.11
  14. Horta Ribeiro, M., Blackburn, J., Bradlyn, B., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., Long, S., Greenberg, S., & Zannettou, S. (2021). The evolution of the manosphere across the web. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 196–207). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18053
  15. Habib, H., Srinivasan, P., & Nithyanand, R. (2022). Making a radical misogynist: How online social engagement with the manosphere influences traits of radicalization. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.08805
  16. Regehr, K., Shaughnessy, C., Zhao, M., Cambazoglu, I., Turner, A., & Shaughnessy, N. (2025). Normalizing toxicity: The role of recommender algorithms for young people’s mental health and social wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1523649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1523649
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants