eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Short Selling and Financing Constraints: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Yixuan Wu
Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research, (2026), Vol.8, No.9, pp.66-81
Published: September 25, 2026
DOI: 10.54691/kvfnq358
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

Since the pilot program of margin trading and securities lending system was launched in China in 2010, a standardized short selling mechanism has been formed through gradual expansion. It has become an important institutional arrangement for improving the information environment and strengthening external governance of the capital market. Faced with widespread financing constraints among domestic firms, A-share listed companies in China over the period 2015–2024 are selected as research samples. As a quasi-natural experiment is constructed based on the phased expansion of margin trading and securities lending, a staggered DID estimation approach is adopted. Systematically investigated herein are how short selling rules affect corporate financing constraints, along with its underlying transmission paths. Estimated outcomes demonstrate several key findings. To start with, the adoption of short selling policies greatly eases financing difficulties faced by listed corporations. The above outcome is still reliable after we take corporate attributes, firm and year fixed effects into consideration. Next, tests on transmission paths prove that short selling lowers information gaps and agency problems. By enhancing corporate information openness and tightening external supervision, it effectively reduces firms’ financing difficulties. The two paths both deliver significant partial mediation. Third, heterogeneous regression results present that short selling plays a stronger mitigating role in private firms, yet its effect is not statistically meaningful within state-owned enterprises. It implies that the external monitoring capacity of short selling functions more effectively in environments featuring serious financing prejudice and insufficient regulatory constraints. Fourth, the core findings remain valid after a series of robustness tests, including placebo test, PSM-DID, replacement of explained variables and adjustment of sample intervals. This paper expands the research scope of the economic consequences of short selling rules, while supplementing prior studies on drivers of financing constraints. It also provides empirical evidence for regulators to optimize the securities credit trading framework, improve corporate financing environment and boost resource distribution performance within the capital market.

Keywords: Short Selling Mechanism; Margin Trading and Short Selling; Financing Constraints; Information Transparency; External Governance.
APA Citation: Yixuan Wu (2026). Short Selling and Financing Constraints: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research, 8(9), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.54691/kvfnq358

References

  1. Li, K., Xu, L. B., & Zhu, W. H. (2014). Short sale constraints and stock mispricing: Evidence from the margin trading and securities lending program. Economic Research Journal, 49(10), 165–178.
  2. Quan, X. F., & Yin, H. Y. (2017). China’s short selling mechanism and corporate innovation: A natural experiment based on the phased expansion of margin trading and securities lending. Management World, (1), 128–144, 187–188.
  3. Li, C. T., Liu, B. B., & Zhou, P. (2017). Short selling and information disclosure: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of securities lending. Journal of Financial Research, (9), 130–145.
  4. Xu, H. W., & Chen, X. (2012). Does the launch of margin trading improve pricing efficiency of underlying stocks? An empirical study based on the difference-in-differences model. Management World, (5), 52–61.
  5. Gu, N. K., & Zhou, Y. L. (2017). Ex ante deterrence of short selling, corporate governance and corporate financing behavior: A quasi-natural experiment based on the margin trading and securities lending system. Management World, (2), 120–134.
  6. Jin, Q. L., Hou, Q. C., Li, G., & Xie, Y. (2015). Deregulation on short selling, corporate investment decisions and option value. Economic Research Journal, 50(10), 76–88.
  7. Li, Z. S., Li, H., Ma, W. L., & et al. (2017). The information governance effect of margin trading and securities lending. Economic Research Journal, 52(11), 150–164.
  8. Boehmer, E., & Wu, J. (2013). Short selling and the price discovery process. Review of Financial Studies, 26(2), 287–322.
  9. Chen, Y., Da, Z., & Huang, D. (2022). Short selling efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 387–408.
  10. Bao, D., Kim, Y., Mian, G. M., & Su, L. (2019). Do managers disclose or withhold bad news? Evidence from short interest. The Accounting Review, 94(3), 1–26.
  11. Beneish, M. D., Lee, C. M. C., & Nichols, D. C. (2015). In short supply: Short-sellers and stock returns. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 60(2–3), 33–57.
  12. Chen, Y., Kelly, B., & Wu, W. (2020). Sophisticated investors and market efficiency: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 138(2), 316–341.
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants