eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design under Uncertainty

Haocheng Tian, Mingzhu Zhang, Jiahe Zhu
Scientific Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, (2025), Vol.7, No.11, pp.107-114
Published: October 30, 2025
DOI: 10.54691/dghzn170
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

Under the global carbon neutrality agenda and increasing supply chain uncertainties, designing supply chain networks that balance economic, environmental, and social sustainability has become a strategic priority for enterprises. This paper proposes a Robust Optimization-based Multi-Objective Mixed Integer Programming model (ROMO-MIP) to address sustainable supply chain network design under uncertainties such as demand fluctuations, carbon price volatility, and supply disruptions. The model simultaneously optimizes three objectives: minimizing total cost, minimizing carbon emissions, and maximizing job creation and regional equity. The -constraint method and the NSGA-III algorithm are employed to generate the Pareto front, and an empirical case study is conducted on the lithium-ion battery supply chain for new energy vehicles in China. Results show that incorporating robustness parameters significantly enhances network resilience under uncertainty, while multi-objective trade-off analysis enables decision-makers to select optimal configurations aligned with policy priorities. This study provides a practical decision-support tool for firms seeking green transformation and resilient operations.

Keywords: Sustainable supply chain network design, multi-objective optimization, robust optimization, uncertainty modeling.
APA Citation: Haocheng Tian, Mingzhu Zhang, Jiahe Zhu (2025). A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design under Uncertainty. Scientific Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(11), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.54691/dghzn170

References

  1. Carter C R. Purchasing and social responsibility: a replication and extension[J]. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2004, 40(3): 4-16.
  2. Seuring S, Müller M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2008, 16(15): 1699-1710.
  3. Tang C S. Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions[J]. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 2006, 9(1): 33-45.
  4. Fan E, Li L, Wang Z, et al. Sustainable recycling technology for Li-ion batteries and beyond: challenges and future prospects[J]. Chemical reviews, 2020, 120(14): 7020-7063.
  5. Halberg N, van der Werf H M G, Basset-Mens C, et al. Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems[J]. Livestock Production Science, 2005, 96(1): 33-50.
  6. Elhedhli S, Merrick R. Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2012, 17(5): 370-379.
  7. Hasani A, Khosrojerdi A. Robust global supply chain network design under disruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: A parallel memetic algorithm for a real-life case study[J]. Transportation research part e: logistics and transportation review, 2016, 87: 20-52.
  8. Bertsimas D, Brown D B, Caramanis C. Theory and applications of robust optimization[J]. SIAM review, 2011, 53(3): 464-501.
  9. Gabrel V, Murat C, Thiele A. Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview[J]. European journal of operational research, 2014, 235(3): 471-483.
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants