Smart Community Governance from an Empowerment Perspective: A Case Study of the Guidong Community Residents' Innovation Lab Empowerment Project
With the acceleration of urbanization and the deepening of grassroots democratization, residents' demands for participation in and decision-making regarding community public affairs are increasing. However, traditional community consultation and deliberation methods often suffer from problems such as monotonous forms, low participation, and low decision-making efficiency, making it difficult to meet the diverse needs of residents in the process of community governance, while also lacking the professional participation of social workers. This study takes the Chengdu Guidong Community Resident Innovation Lab Empowerment Program as an example to explore how social workers can play a role in trustworthy community governance. As an innovative practice of grassroots governance in Chengdu, trustworthy community governance, by introducing the concept of trust, enables the community to build a sustainable development relationship of mutual benefit, win-win cooperation, mutual assistance, and mutual trust among all stakeholders, reducing trust deficiencies, lowering communication and collaboration costs, and improving the effectiveness of grassroots governance through co-construction, co-governance, and shared benefits.
References
- Chenjing, Luoqin.Study on the Absence and Reconstruction of Subjectivity in Social Work Organizations' Participation in Community Governance. Social Work and Management, Vol. 25 (2025) No. 04, p. 68-78+88.
- Junhao, L. A. I. A Critical Reflection on the “Social Investment” approach used in the Chinese Social Work Reform. 2022.
- World Health Organisation, 2025. https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/seventh-global-conference/community-empowerment
- Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American journal of community psychology, Vol. 9 (1981) No. 1, p.1-25.
- Rappaport, J. Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. Prevention in Human Services, Vol. 3(1984) No. 1, p. 1-7.
- Rappaport, J. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American journal of community psychology, Vol. 15(1987) No. 2, p. 121-148.
- Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. Empowerment theory, research, and application. American journal of community psychology, Vol 23 (1995), No 1, p. 569-579.
- Anckermann, S., Dominguez, M., Soto, N., Kjaerulf, F., Berliner, P., & Naima-Mikkelsen, E.. Psycho-social support to large numbers of traumatized people in post-conflict societies: an approach to community development in Guatemala. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, Vol 15 (2005) No. 2, p. 136–152.
- Chengdu Grassroots Public Comprehensive Service and Supervision Platform, 2019. http://m.jcpt.chengdu.gov.cn/xinduqu/guidongshequ/