eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Metaphor Translation in China's Green Development in the New Era: A Study from the Perspective of Emotional Equivalence

Haidi Feng
Scientific Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, (2026), Vol.8, No.4, pp.121-130
Published: April 29, 2026
DOI: 10.54691/kxdmz869
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

This paper examines metaphorical expressions in the white paper China's Green Development in the New Era as carriers of policy concepts, national sentiments, and values. Drawing on conceptual metaphor theory and the principle of emotional equivalence, it systematically analyzes seven metaphor types and their translation strategies. Using HanLP for sentiment analysis, the study compares the emotional polarity of metaphorical expressions in the Chinese and English versions to determine whether the translation preserves the source language's positive emotional connotations and whether target readers can achieve comparable emotional resonance. Findings reveal a systematic link between metaphor translation strategies and emotional conveyance, with the degree of emotional equivalence significantly shaped by the cultural specificity of source-language metaphors. By offering cognitive insights and empirical evidence, this paper aims to contribute to the global dissemination of China’s cognitive frameworks and political discourse.

Keywords: China’s green development in the new era; conceptual metaphor; metaphor translation; emotional equivalence; political discourse.
APA Citation: Haidi Feng (2026). Metaphor Translation in China's Green Development in the New Era: A Study from the Perspective of Emotional Equivalence. Scientific Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(4), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.54691/kxdmz869

References

  1. Sun, Y., & Zhou, T. (2024). Insights into English translation of metaphors from the perspective of national translation practice theory. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, (1), 125–135.
  2. Xu, D., & Zhang, X. (2025). On cognitive equivalence in emotional reconstruction in the translation of children's literature. Foreign Language Teaching Theory and Practice, (6), 80–87.
  3. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
  4. Zhou, X., & Huang, H. (2024). A dynamic visual comparative analysis of metaphor cognition research at home and abroad (2001–2022). Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 51(5), 116–124.
  5. Steen, G. J. (2011). When is metaphor deliberate? In N.-L. Johannesson, C. Alm-Arvius, & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the Stockholm 2008 Metaphor Festival (pp. 43–65). University of Stockholm.
  6. Hu, Z. (2019). Methods and theories of metaphor translation. Contemporary Rhetoric, (4), 1–9.
  7. Newmark, P. (2001). A textbook of translation. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
  8. Schäffner, C. (2004). Metaphor and translation: Some implications of a cognitive approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1253–1269
  9. Lu, W., & Chen, H. (2020). A study on the English translation strategies of metaphors in Keywords for China in the New Era. English Studies, (2), 136–145.
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants