Analysis of Oral English Errors and Correction Strategies for Junior Middle School Students
Oral English mistakes have always been the focus of teachers' attention, so it is also the goal of teachers to correct their mistakes. At present, in the process of junior middle school students' English learning, oral English has always been a shortcoming of junior middle school students, and there are many types of oral mistakes junior middle school students make in the process of oral English learning, such as pronunciation and intonation mistakes, vocabulary mistakes, grammar mistakes and pragmatic expression mistakes. According to the above types of oral error correction, this study conducted a comprehensive analysis of the types of oral error of junior high school students and a systematic analysis of the error correction strategies based on the types of oral error, the subject of error correction, the types of error correction and the timing of error correction. By investigating the current situation of English teachers' error correction in junior middle school, this paper aims to help English teachers improve their teaching methods and enhance classroom efficiency.
References
- LYSTER R. Negotiation of Form, Re⁃casts, and Explicit Correction in Relation to Error Types and Learners Repair in Immersion Classroom[J]. Language Learning,1998(48)2:183-218.
- CORDER S P. The Significance of Learner’s Errors [J]. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 2009(11):161-170.
- LYSTER R., RANTA L. Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classroom[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,1997,19(1):37-66.
- LONG M. Problems in SLA [M]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum,2006.
- Brown H D. Principles of language learning and teaching[M]. New York: Longman, 2000.
- Burt M K. Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom[J]. TESOL quarterly, 1975: 53-63.
- Krashen S. Principles and practice in second language acquisition[J]. 1982.
- Gao, L. 2007. The analysis of oral errors and error correction strategies. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 12 (2), pp. 165~166.