eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Macrophage Polarization Signatures from RNA-seq Identify Therapeutic Exosomal miRNA Payloads for Muscle Regeneration: An Open, Reproducible Computational Framework

Shuhan Zhu
World Scientific Research Journal, (2026), Vol.12, No.10, pp.171-187
Published: September 19, 2026
DOI: 10.6911/WSRJ.202610_12(10).0017
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

Background. Exosomal microRNA (miRNA) cocktails are emerging as cell-free regenerative therapeutics for skeletal muscle injury. Existing payload-design tools nominate candidate miRNAs through abundance ranking or curated literature screens; few benchmark their selections against random baselines or report exhaustive search, so apparently optimal payloads can simply recapitulate prior knowledge.Methods. We re-analysed GSE212372, a 2×2 factorial RNA-seq study of mouse tibialis-anterior macrophages (n=12; anti-TNFα neutralising antibody × Ifngr1 wt/null vs. null/null). Differential expression was performed with pyDESeq2 with Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Pre-ranked gene set enrichment analysis was run with gseapy against MSigDB Hallmark, KEGG, GO Biological Process and WikiPathways libraries. Leading-edge genes from pathways at FDR<0.10 were connected to 16 exosomal miRNAs through a literature-curated bipartite graph of 84 validated miRNA-target interactions. Each miRNA was scored by the sum of |NES| over its real differentially expressed targets. Payload-of-four selection was evaluated by greedy top-K, exhaustive enumeration of all (16¦4)=1820 combinations, and comparison against 1000 random combinations using z-score and one-sample t-test. Results. Across 15,137 filtered genes, anti-TNFα blockade produced 13 DEGs at padj<0.05 with subtle effects on cytoskeletal, migration and proliferation genes (Plxna1, Mmp14, Ccr2). Ifngr1 ablation produced two strict DEGs but pervasive pathway-level collapse of interferon-γ response (NES =-2.35, FDR =0.024). GSEA recovered 35/50 Hallmark pathways at FDR<0.25 in the anti-TNFα contrast: paradoxical up-regulation of TNFα/NF-κB (NES =+2.24), IL-6/JAK/STAT3 (+1.84) and interferon-α response (+2.00), with concurrent suppression of Myc, E2F, G2-M, mTORC1 and glycolysis programs. Greedy and exhaustive search agreed on the unique optimum: miR-155 + miR-146a + miR-125b-5p + miR-21, score 26.86, z=3.72, p<10-300 versus random baseline, 100th percentile. Conclusion. A bipartite scoring framework anchored in real RNA-seq leading-edge genes recovers a different payload (immune regulators) from the one a literature-only prior would suggest (muscle myo-miRs). The pipeline is open, dataset-agnostic and fully scripted in eight files. It is intended for in silico payload prioritisation prior to wet-lab validation.

Keywords: Exosomes; microRNA; macrophage polarization; muscle regeneration; gene set enrichment analysis; combinatorial therapy; reproducible research.
APA Citation: Shuhan Zhu (2026). Macrophage Polarization Signatures from RNA-seq Identify Therapeutic Exosomal miRNA Payloads for Muscle Regeneration: An Open, Reproducible Computational Framework. World Scientific Research Journal, 12(10), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.6911/WSRJ.202610_12(10).0017

References

  1. Tidball, J. G., Welc, S. S., & Wehling-Henricks, M. (2023). Immune-derived signals in muscle regeneration: An updated synthesis. Annual Review of Physiology, 85, 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-031621-101007.
  2. Chazaud, B. (2024). Macrophages: Supportive cells for skeletal muscle regeneration – 2024 update. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 81(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05132-3
  3. Xiang, S., Gilbert, T. M., et al. (2023). Spatial and temporal mapping of macrophage subsets in muscle regeneration by integrated single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Nature Communications, 14, 7298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43156-8
  4. Larouche, J., Greising, S. M., & Aguilar, C. A. (2022). Multi-omic dissection of skeletal muscle injury models reveals macrophage heterogeneity. Nature Communications, 13, 6710. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34428-w
  5. Welsh, J. A., Goberdhan, D. C. I., et al. (2024). Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): From basic to advanced knowledge. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, 13(2), e12404. https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12404
  6. Kim, H. J., Park, S. Y., & Lee, S. Y. (2024). Engineered exosomes for combinatorial miRNA delivery: Design principles and translational hurdles. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 204, 115171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2023.115171
  7. Bi, Y., Qiao, X., Cai, J., et al. (2024). Hypoxic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes promote muscle satellite cell activation through miR-210-3p targeting KLF7. International Immunopharmacology, 142, 113143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113143
  8. Xie, T., Liang, Y., Yu, Z., et al. (2025). BMSC-derived exosomal miR-126-5p targets FBXO32/MyoD axis to promote skeletal muscle regeneration. Acta Physiologica, 241(3), e70114. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.70114
  9. Li, X., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025). Fibroblast-activated-protein-positive exosomal miR-125b-5p drives macrophage M2 polarisation in skeletal muscle regeneration. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 16, 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-025-04452-w
  10. Kim, M. J., Park, S.-H., et al. (2025). Platelet-rich plasma derived exosomes accelerate muscle recovery via integrated miRNA-mRNA reprogramming. Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 57(3), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-025-01606-x
  11. Lu, H., Han, X., Yang, H., et al. (2024). Myogenic exosomal miR-140-5p attenuates skeletal muscle injury via TGF-β/Smad pathway suppression. Aging (Albany NY), 16(9), 7857–7873. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.205617
  12. Zhou, W., Wang, Y., Tang, B., et al. (2025). Combinatorial exosomal miRNA therapy for skeletal muscle injury: A systematic review of preclinical studies (2020-2024). Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 14(2), sztae079. https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/sztae079
  13. Kalra, H., Drummen, G. P. C., & Mathivanan, S. (2024). Vesiclepedia 2024: An extracellular vesicles compendium with continuous community annotation. Nucleic Acids Research, 52(D1), D1389–D1395. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1062
  14. Liu, T., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., et al. (2022). EVAtlas: A comprehensive knowledgebase for ncRNA expression in human extracellular vesicles. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(D1), D111–D117. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab668
  15. Huang, H.-Y., Lin, Y.-C.-D., Cui, S., et al. (2022). miRTarBase update 2022: An informative resource for experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(D1), D222–D230. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1079
  16. Liu, X., Yang, T., Han, X., Lyu, B., & Cui, L. (2023). GraphTar: A graph-attention network approach for miRNA-target interaction prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 24(2), bbad068. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbad068
  17. Wang, J., Li, H., et al. (2024). Multi-task hypergraph neural network for miRNA-target prediction across cell types. Bioinformatics, 40(3), btae129. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae129
  18. Li, D., Yu, X., et al. (2023). Multi-task learning improves miRNA target prediction by jointly modelling sequence, structure and accessibility. Nucleic Acids Research, 51(16), e88. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad541
  19. Collister, D., Greene, C. S., & Tasaki, S. (2024). Statistical anchoring of multi-target therapeutic combinations: A benchmark protocol. Patterns, 5(1), 100894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100894
  20. Varga, T., Mounier, R., et al. (2022). TNF-α and IFN-γ cooperate for efficient pro- to anti-inflammatory transition of macrophages during muscle regeneration. Cell Reports, 41(3), 111522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111522
  21. Muzellec, B., Telenczuk, M., Cabeli, V., & Andreux, M. (2023). PyDESeq2: A Python package for bulk RNA-seq differential expression analysis. Bioinformatics, 39(9), btad547. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad547
  22. Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology, 15(12), 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
  23. Fang, Z., Liu, X., & Peltz, G. (2023). GSEApy: A comprehensive package for performing gene set enrichment analysis in Python. Bioinformatics, 39(1), btac757. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac757
  24. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57(1), 289–300.
  25. Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., et al. (2005). Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(43), 15545–15550. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102
  26. Krasniewski, L. K., Chakraborty, P., Cui, C.-Y., et al. (2022). Single-cell analysis of skeletal muscle macrophages reveals age-associated functional subpopulations. eLife, 11, e77974. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77974
  27. Lai, H., Li, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2022). exoRBase 2.0: An atlas of mRNA, lncRNA and circRNA in extracellular vesicles from human biofluids. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(D1), D118–D128. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1085
  28. Ratti, M., Lampis, A., et al. (2025). miR-155 in macrophage biology: A 2025 update on therapeutic targeting. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(3), 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26031209
  29. Paterson, M. R., & Kriegel, A. J. (2022). miR-146a: A master regulator of innate immunity and a therapeutic target in inflammation. Frontiers in Immunology, 13, 917768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.917768
  30. Schulte, L. N., Westermann, A. J., & Vogel, J. (2021). Differential roles of miR-21 in immune cells: A quantitative review. Trends in Immunology, 42(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2020.12.008
  31. Martinez-Sanchez, A., Murray, H., et al. (2023). miR-125b orchestrates macrophage activation through IRF4 and KLF13. iScience, 26(7), 107131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107131
  32. Huang, Y., Liu, J., et al. (2023). Extracellular vesicle biomarker discovery using machine learning and deep learning. Biomarker Research, 11, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-023-00540-2
  33. Vega, M., Sanchez, A., et al. (2025). AI-powered liquid biopsy and extracellular vesicle analysis: A roadmap for clinical translation. Clinica Chimica Acta, 566, 120484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2025.120484
  34. Chen, T., Yang, B., et al. (2023). Exosomal microRNA networks in skeletal muscle homeostasis and disease: A 2023 perspective. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 34(6), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2023.03.005
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants