eLibrary
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Analysis of Hotspots and Frontiers in Nursing Research for Cancer Clinical Trials Based on Web of Science: A Bibliometric Study

Lihui Li, Xiaoman Zeng, Mengfei Xie, Qianwen Liu
World Scientific Research Journal, (2026), Vol.12, No.8, pp.30-47
Published: August 18, 2026
DOI: 10.6911/WSRJ.202608_12(8).0004
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

Background: Oncology clinical trial nursing sits at the intersection of clinical trial protocols and patient care, and it has a direct impact on both trial quality and patient safety. However, the overall research trends in this field have not been clearly mapped. To address this gap, we used bibliometric methods to systematically examine the knowledge structure and development of oncology clinical trial nursing. Methods: We searched the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) for publications on oncology clinical trial nursing from January 1, 1999, to September 30, 2025. We then analyzed the retrieved records using Microsoft Excel, VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and RStudio, focusing on publication volume, countries, institutions, authors, journals, and keywords. Results: A total of 1,510 papers were included in the final analysis. Annual publication output showed a fluctuating but overall upward trend. Among countries, the United States was the most productive, contributing 688 papers, and also had the strongest collaboration network (total link strength [TLS] = 145). At the institutional level, Harvard University led in publication volume (240 papers) and maintained the closest inter-institutional collaborations (TLS=93). Among authors, Miaskowski C ranked first with 20 publications, while Mitchell SA had the broadest research collaboration network (TLS=46). Journal analysis indicated that Oncology Nursing Forum (90 papers; IF=1.4) published the most articles in the field of oncology clinical trial nursing. Research hotspots primarily focused on four themes: clinical treatment, doctor-patient communication, supportive care, and symptom management. Recent emerging keywords included survivors, pain, interventions, nursing care, anxiety, feasibility, and education. Conclusion: Research output in oncology clinical trial nursing is likely to continue rising, but stronger collaboration across countries, institutions, and authors is still needed. Future work is expected to center on symptom management, palliative care, and psychosocial support.

Keywords: Oncology; Clinical trial; Nursing; Bibliometrics; Hotspots; Frontiers.
APA Citation: Lihui Li, Xiaoman Zeng, Mengfei Xie, Qianwen Liu (2026). Analysis of Hotspots and Frontiers in Nursing Research for Cancer Clinical Trials Based on Web of Science: A Bibliometric Study. World Scientific Research Journal, 12(8), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.6911/WSRJ.202608_12(8).0004

References

  1. Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., et al. (2021). Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 71(3), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.
  2. Balogh, E. P., Levit, L. A., Unger, J. M., et al. (2025). ASCO State of Cancer Care in America Special Report 2025: Access to Cancer Clinical Trials in the United States. JCO Oncol Pract. https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00233
  3. Kim, E., Yang, J., Park, S., & Shin, K. (2023). Factors Affecting Success of New Drug Clinical Trials. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 57(4), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00509-1
  4. Portier, W. S. (2020). Cancer Clinical Trials: Implications for Oncology Nurses. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 36(2), 150998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2020.150998
  5. Bozzetti, M., Soncini, S., Bassi, M. C., et al. (2024). Assessment of Nursing Workload and Complexity Associated With Oncology Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 40(5), 151711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151711
  6. Markey, N., Howitt, B., El-Mansouri, I., et al. (2024). Clinical Trials Are Becoming More Complex: A Machine Learning Analysis of Data From Over 16,000 Trials. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 3514. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53211-z
  7. Legor, K. (2020). Oncology Nursing Considerations in a Clinical Trials Environment. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 36(3), 151020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151020
  8. Stacey, D., Skrutkowski, M., Carley, M., et al. (2015). Training Oncology Nurses to Use Remote Symptom Support Protocols: A Retrospective Pre-/Post Study. Oncology Nursing Forum, 42(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1188/15.ONF.174-182
  9. Flocke, S. A., Antognoli, E., Daly, B. J., et al. (2017). The Role of Oncology Nurses in Discussing Clinical Trials. Oncology Nursing Forum, 44(5), 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1188/17.ONF.547-552
  10. Vitale, E., Lupo, R., Conte, L., et al. (2024). Self-Perceived Attitudes of Italian Oncology Nurses Towards Clinical Trial Involvement: A Cohort Observational Study. Tumori, 110(6), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916241290736
  11. Yun, E. J., Yoon, D. Y., Kim, B. N., et al. (2015). Endovascular Treatment for Extracranial Carotid Stenosis: A 10-Year Bibliometric Analysis. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 49(1–2), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538574415585128
  12. Estrada-Lorenzo, J. M., Martín-Arriscado Arroba, C., & López-López, C. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Original Articles of Journal Enfermería Intensiva in the Period 2001–2020. Enfermería Intensiva (English Edition), 34(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2022.02.003
  13. Zhou, L., Li, T., Zheng, Q., et al. (2025). Research Progress and Future Opportunities of Pediatric Cow Milk Protein Allergy: A Bibliometric Overview and Evidence Mapping. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000545367
  14. Wilson, V. (2016). Research Methods: Bibliometrics. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(1(S)), 50. https://doi.org/10.18438/b80917
  15. Chopkar, D., Shamrao Gajbe, D., & Phatak, A. (2025). Mapping the Future of Research Evaluation: Current Trends in Bibliometrics. ISJEM, 04(08), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55041/isjem.pkdal047
  16. Li, D., Ou, J., Zeng, Y., et al. (2023). Bibliometric Study on Clinical Research of Osteoporosis in Adolescents. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1041360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1041360
  17. Lando, T. (2013). Visualizing Similarities in the Rasch Model Response Patterns With VOSviewer.
  18. Chen, C. (2004). Searching for Intellectual Turning Points: Progressive Knowledge Domain Visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(suppl 1), 5303–5310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100
  19. Wu, M. Q., Wu, D. Q., Hu, C. P., & Iao, L. S. (2021). Studies on Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder in the Past 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis via CiteSpace. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 776883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.776883
  20. Green, L. (2011). Explaining the Role of the Nurse in Clinical Trials. Nursing Standard, 25(22), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.25.22.35.s50
  21. Lavender, V., & Croudass, A. (2019). The Role of the Nurse in Supporting Cancer Clinical Trials. British Journal of Nursing, 28(4), S14–S17. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.4.S14
  22. Riffat, M. (2023). The Evolving Role of Nurses in Patient-Centered Care. NRS, 01. https://doi.org/10.54393/nrs.v3i01.37
  23. Gordon, J. (2024). Violence, Economic Development, and Knowledge Production. Philosophy & Social Criticism. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537241238368
  24. Dutta, G. P. (1994). Problems of Research in Developing Countries. Journal of the Indian Medical Association, 92(2), 60–63.
  25. Acharya, K. (2019). Publishing Quandaries for Scientists From Developing Countries. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 28(4), 861–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-019-02961-8
  26. The Lancet Rheumatology. (2024). Advancing Research and Equity Through Collaboration. The Lancet Rheumatology, 6(9), e587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00245-5
  27. Agyepong, I. A., Godt, S., Sombie, I., et al. (2021). Strengthening Capacities and Resource Allocation for Co-Production of Health Research in Low and Middle Income Countries. BMJ, 372, n166. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n166
  28. Miaskowski, C., Cooper, B. A., Dhruva, A., et al. (2012). Evidence of Associations Between Cytokine Genes and Subjective Reports of Sleep Disturbance in Oncology Patients and Their Family Caregivers. PLOS ONE, 7(4), e34660. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034660
  29. McCorkle, R., Dowd, M., Ercolano, E., et al. (2009). Effects of a Nursing Intervention on Quality of Life Outcomes in Post-Surgical Women With Gynecological Cancers. Psycho-Oncology, 18(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1365
  30. Karpen, S. R., Klein, A., Alloway, R. R., et al. (2021). The Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Medication Adherence Assessment in Patient-Focused Drug Development for Solid Organ Transplantation. Transplantation, 105(3), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003556
  31. Anya, I. (2004). Representation of Authors and Editors From Poor Countries: Partnerships May Well Be Unequal. BMJ, 329(7457), 110. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7457.110-a
  32. Houston, H., Beck, I., Albert, C., et al. (2024). Anxiety Symptoms Predict Head and Neck Cancer Survival: Exploring Mediation by Systemic Inflammation and Tumor Response to Treatment. Psycho-Oncology, 33(2), e6312. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6312
  33. Semple, C. J., Dunwoody, L., Kernohan, W. G., & McCaughan, E. (2009). Development and Evaluation of a Problem-Focused Psychosocial Intervention for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17(4), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0480-7
  34. Patsopoulos, N. A., Analatos, A. A., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences. JAMA, 293(19), 2362–2366. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.19.2362
  35. Trocky, N. M. (2001). The Journey to Becoming a Research Nurse. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 5(1), 9.
  36. Marcath, L. A., Coe, T. D., Hoylman, E. K., et al. (2018). Prevalence of Drug-Drug Interactions in Oncology Patients Enrolled on National Clinical Trials Network Oncology Clinical Trials. BMC Cancer, 18(1), 1151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5076-0
  37. Allen, C. J., Snyder, R. A., Horn, D. M., et al. (2023). Defining Priorities in Value-Based Cancer Care: Insights From the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology National Cooperative Group Survey. JCO Oncology Practice, 19(10), 915–924. https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.23.00159
  38. Gregersen, T. A., Birkelund, R., Wolderslund, M., Steffensen, K. D., & Ammentorp, J. (2022). Patients' Experiences of the Decision-Making Process for Clinical Trial Participation. Nursing & Health Sciences, 24(1), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12933
  39. Salvetti, M., Donato, S., Machado, C., de Almeida, N., Dos Santos, D., & Kurita, G. (2025). Psychoeducational Nursing Intervention for Symptom Management in Cancer Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 8(1), 100334. https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_56_20
  40. Guerdoux, E., Stoebner, A., Coutant, L., et al. (2025). Accepting to Participate in an Early-Phase Clinical Trial in Oncology: A Qualitative Study on the Patients' Experiences, Understanding, and Inner Motivations. Psycho-Oncology, 34(10), e70291. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70291
© 2026 eLibrary · Stand on the shoulders of giants